Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Classic 350

Detailed Design, Specs & Performance Comparison | Which Cruiser Should You Pick?

Introduction

Royal Enfield’s lineup has two incredibly popular 350cc cruisers: the Hunter 350 and the Classic 350. Both share the same J-series 349cc engine, but they cater to different riding styles and aesthetics. In this in-depth comparison, we’ll cover:

By the end of this post, you’ll know which 350cc Royal Enfield cruiser best matches your personality and riding needs. Let’s dive in!

Design & Ergonomics

Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Hunter 350

The Hunter 350 features a modern streetfighter design with a fully digital console, flat handlebar, shorter tail, and aggressive stance. It’s lighter at 181 kg (kerb) and has a more upright riding position ideal for city commutes.

Royal Enfield Classic 350

Classic 350

The Classic 350 brings the timeless “bullet” styling—teardrop tank, spoked wheels, vintage round headlamp, and sprung saddle. Heavier at 195 kg (kerb), it exudes retro charm and is perfect for relaxed highway cruising.

Technical Specifications

Specification Hunter 350 Classic 350
Engine Type J-Series 349cc, Air/Oil-cooled, Single Cylinder J-Series 349cc, Air/Oil-cooled, Single Cylinder
Power 20.2 PS @ 6,100 rpm 20.2 PS @ 6,100 rpm
Torque 27 Nm @ 4,000 rpm 27 Nm @ 4,000 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed Constant Mesh 5-Speed Constant Mesh
Frame Single Downtube, Central Balancer, CVD Single Downtube, Central Balancer, CVD
Suspension (Front) Telescopic Fork (41 mm) Telescopic Fork (35 mm) with gaiters
Suspension (Rear) Dual Coil-over Shocks (5-step adjustable) Dual Coil-over Shocks (5-step adjustable)
Brakes Disc 300 mm (Front) / Drum 270 mm (Rear) Disc 300 mm (Front) / Disc 270 mm (Rear)
Tyres 100/90 - 19 (Front) / 130/70 - 17 (Rear) 90/90 - 19 (Front) / 110/90 - 18 (Rear)
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 Litres 13.5 Litres
Weight (Kerb) 181 kg 195 kg
Seat Height 795 mm 805 mm
Wheelbase 1405 mm 1390 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 135 mm
Fuel Efficiency 35–40 km/l (city/highway) 35–40 km/l (city/highway)

Performance & Ride Quality

Despite sharing the same powertrain, the riding experience differs due to chassis setup, ergonomics, and weight distribution:

Pros & Cons

Hunter 350 Pros

  • Lighter kerb weight for zippy city performance
  • Modern styling and digital console
  • Lower seat height (795 mm) for easier reach
  • Slightly better handling in tight corners

Hunter 350 Cons

  • Less wind protection at higher speeds (no windscreen)
  • Smaller fuel tank (13 L) limits touring range
  • Less retro charm compared to Classic 350

Classic 350 Pros

  • Timeless “bullet” styling with retro elements
  • Sprung saddle and wider seat for long-distance comfort
  • Better highway stability and wind protection
  • 13.5 L tank extends touring range

Classic 350 Cons

  • Heavier kerb weight (195 kg) can feel sluggish in city traffic
  • Higher seat height (805 mm) may be tough for shorter riders
  • Older, analog-style console (no full digital display)

Color Options & Maintenance Tips

Both models come in multiple paint schemes. Choose based on your taste and upkeep preferences:

Hunter 350 Color Variants

  • Sunset Red
  • Stellar Black
  • Rock Red
  • Regal Brown
  • Comet Blue

Classic 350 Color Variants

  • Fireball Red
  • Mirage Silver
  • Halcyon Green
  • Stealth Black
  • Cafe Racer Edition (Special)

Maintenance Tip: Darker colours like black and blue hide minor scratches better than lighter or matte finishes. Keep a soft microfiber cloth and gentle automotive shampoo handy to maintain shine. Wax every 2–3 months helps preserve paint.

Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?

Both the Hunter 350 and Classic 350 leverage Royal Enfield’s proven 349cc engine, delivering around 20.2 PS and 27 Nm of torque. However, your riding style and preferences will determine the right pick: